- Path:
Periodical
- Title:
- Theoretical inquiries in law
- Publication:
-
Tel Aviv: The Cegla center for interdisciplinary research of the law
- Note:
- Gesehen am 06.05.2022
- C!URL-Ä(06-02-12)
- Scope:
- Online-Ressource
- ISSN:
- 1565-3404
- ZDB-ID:
-
2113354-2
- VÖBB-Katalog:
- 35425758
- Keywords:
- Zeitschrift
- Classification:
- Recht
- Collection:
- Recht
- Copyright:
- Rights reserved
- Accessibility:
- Eingeschränkter Zugang mit Nutzungsbeschränkungen
- Title:
- Theoretical inquiries in law
- Publication:
-
Tel Aviv: The Cegla center for interdisciplinary research of the law
- Note:
- Gesehen am 06.05.2022
- C!URL-Ä(06-02-12)
- Scope:
- Online-Ressource
- ISSN:
- 1565-3404
- ZDB-ID:
-
2113354-2
- VÖBB-Katalog:
- 35425758
- Keywords:
- Zeitschrift
- Classification:
- Recht
- Collection:
- Recht
- Copyright:
- Rights reserved
- Accessibility:
- Eingeschränkter Zugang mit Nutzungsbeschränkungen
Article
- Title:
- Through a glass darkly: TPLF viewed through a procedural lens
- Publication:
-
Tel Aviv: The Cegla center for interdisciplinary research of the law, 2025
- Language:
- English
- Information:
- Abstract: Legal responses to litigation funding could take many forms—consumer protection, regulation of interest rates and fees, perhaps even prohibition (as under the old doctrines of champerty and maintenance). In the U.S., procedural responses, often emphasizing disclosure of funding, have featured prominently. From the perspective of one directly involved in the U.S. rulemaking effort, this Article explores the challenges of designing such a rule. Among other things, it notes that litigation funding actually could support important law-implementation features of American litigation. But a host of uncertainties mean that for the present, the future of mandated disclosure of funding remains unclear, as it also does in Europe.
- Scope:
- Online-Ressource
- Note:
- Kein Open Access
- Archivierung/Langzeitarchivierung gewährleistet
- Copyright:
- Rights reserved
- Accessibility:
- Eingeschränkter Zugang mit Nutzungsbeschränkungen
- Title:
- Through a glass darkly: TPLF viewed through a procedural lens
- Publication:
-
Tel Aviv: The Cegla center for interdisciplinary research of the law, 2025
- Language:
- English
- Information:
- Abstract: Legal responses to litigation funding could take many forms—consumer protection, regulation of interest rates and fees, perhaps even prohibition (as under the old doctrines of champerty and maintenance). In the U.S., procedural responses, often emphasizing disclosure of funding, have featured prominently. From the perspective of one directly involved in the U.S. rulemaking effort, this Article explores the challenges of designing such a rule. Among other things, it notes that litigation funding actually could support important law-implementation features of American litigation. But a host of uncertainties mean that for the present, the future of mandated disclosure of funding remains unclear, as it also does in Europe.
- Scope:
- Online-Ressource
- Note:
- Kein Open Access
- Archivierung/Langzeitarchivierung gewährleistet
- Copyright:
- Rights reserved
- Accessibility:
- Eingeschränkter Zugang mit Nutzungsbeschränkungen