- Path:
-
Equity, diversity, and inclusion in sports analytics
Files
External resources
Periodical
- Title:
- Journal of quantitative analysis in sports
- Publication:
-
Berlin Boston, Mass.: De Gruyter, 2005 -
- Scope:
- Online-Ressource
- Note:
- Gesehen am 06.02.12
- C!URL-Ä(06-02-12)
- ISSN:
- 1559-0410
- ZDB-ID:
- 2233187-6
- Keywords:
- Zeitschrift
- Classification:
- Sport
- Copyright:
- Rights reserved
- Accessibility:
- Eingeschränkter Zugang mit Nutzungsbeschränkungen
- Collection:
- Sport
Article
- Title:
- Equity, diversity, and inclusion in sports analytics
- Publication:
-
Berlin Boston, Mass.: De Gruyter, 2024
- Language:
- English
- Scope:
- Online-Ressource
- Note:
- Open Access
- Archivierung/Langzeitarchivierung gewährleistet
- Keywords:
- equity ; diversity ; inclusion ; discrimination ; sports analytics ; sports
- Copyright:
- Rights reserved
- Accessibility:
- Free Access
- Information:
-
Abstract: This paper presents a landmark study of equity, diversity and inclusion (EDI) in the field of sports analytics. We developed a survey that examined personal and job-related demographics, as well as individual perceptions and experiences about EDI in the workplace. We sent the survey to individuals in the five major North American professional leagues, representatives from the Olympic and Paralympic Committees in Canada and the U.S., the NCAA Division I programs, companies in sports tech/analytics, and university research groups. Our findings indicate the presence of a clear dominant group in sports analytics identifying as: young (72.0 %), White (69.5 %), heterosexual (89.7 %) and male (82.0 %). Within professional sports, males in management positions earned roughly $30,000 (27 %) more on average compared to females. A smaller but equally alarming pay gap of $17,000 (14 %) was found between White and racialized management personnel. Of concern, females were nearly five times as likely to experience discrimination and twice as likely to have considered leaving their job due to isolation or feeling unwelcome. While they had similar levels of agreement regarding fair processes for rewards and compensation, females “strongly agreed” less often than males regarding equitable support, equitable workload, having a voice, and being taken seriously. Over one third (36.3 %) of females indicated that they “strongly agreed” that they must work harder than others to be valued equally, compared to 9.8 % of males. We conclude the paper with concrete recommendations that could be considered to create a more equitable, diverse and inclusive environment for individuals working within the sports analytics sector.